{"id":12830,"date":"2018-01-23T12:47:23","date_gmt":"2018-01-23T11:47:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/?p=12830"},"modified":"2023-07-15T07:13:06","modified_gmt":"2023-07-15T05:13:06","slug":"gerichte-k%c3%b6nnen-nach-din-en-iso-iec-17024-zertifizierte-sachverst%c3%a4ndige-beauftragen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/?p=12830","title":{"rendered":"Gerichte k\u00f6nnen nach DIN EN ISO\/IEC 17024 zertifizierte Sachverst\u00e4ndige beauftragen"},"content":{"rendered":"

A recent decision by the Hechingen District Court states that certification, if it is carried out according to the DIN EN ISO\/IEC 17024 standard, represents a proof of competence comparable to a public appointment and is to be equated with it (Hechingen Regional Court, decision of July 19, 2017, Az. 1 OH 19\/15).<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

The applicant had requested that the expert be canceled and a new expert commissioned because the court-appointed expert was not publicly appointed and sworn in. <\/span>After the application was rejected by the Hechingen Regional Court, the applicant lodged an immediate appeal against the decision with the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court. <\/span>The Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart rejected the applicant’s complaint on the grounds that:<\/span><\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

\u201cWith his appeal, the applicant is ultimately attacking the appointment of the court-appointed expert. <\/span>However, this is a decision that is not contestable under Section 490 (2) sentence 2 ZPO, as this affects the order of evidence. <\/span>On the other hand, there is no decision that would have affected the applicant’s right to select an expert. <\/span>Because the person of the expert is determined by the court (\u00a7\u00a7 492 Abs. 1, 404 ZPO)“.<\/span><\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

This can also be an expert certified according to DIN EN ISO\/IEC 17024.<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

The provision of Section 404 (3) ZPO (priority of the publicly appointed expert) is a mere regulatory provision. <\/span>The court that commissions a certified expert is therefore not acting incorrectly, according to the Hechingen district court with reference to Z\u00f6ller-Greger, ZPO, \u00a7 404 para. 2 and the judgment of the OLG Hamm of June 7th, 2010, Az . <\/span>The D\u00fcsseldorf Higher Regional Court also decided accordingly in its judgment of December 4th, 2012, Az. I-23 U 181\/11.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

If an expert is certified but not publicly appointed, the lack of public appointment according to this decision does not justify a presumption of a lack of specialist knowledge. <\/span>Rather, the expertise results from its certification.<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A recent decision by the Hechingen District Court states that certification, if it is carried out according to the DIN EN ISO\/IEC 17024 standard, represents a proof of competence comparable to a public appointment and is to be equated with it (Hechingen Regional Court, decision of July 19, 2017, Az. 1 OH 19\/15). The applicant …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12834,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","tve_updated_post":"","tve_custom_css":"","tve_user_custom_css":"","tve_globals":{},"tcb2_ready":1,"tcb_editor_enabled":0,"tve_landing_page":"","_tve_header":"","_tve_footer":""},"categories":[22071,22108,22073,22072],"tags":[22097,22117,22092,22090,22091,22095,22116,22096,22089,22098,22094,22043,22088,22093],"class_list":["post-12830","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sachverstndigen-recht","category-deutschland","category-sachverstndige","category-zertifizierung","tag-az-1-oh-1915","tag-bvs","tag-din-en-isoiec-17024","tag-gericht","tag-gerichtsaufttrag","tag-gleichstellung","tag-ihk","tag-landgericht-hechingen","tag-ffentliche-bestellung","tag-olg-stuttgart","tag-sachkundenachweis","tag-urteil","tag-zertifizierung","tag-zpo"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12830","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12830"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12830\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/12834"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12830"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12830"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.schneider-immobilienbewertung.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12830"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}